Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

quote:
Originally posted by Old Glory:
The math is there so it must be right.
Toner - $299 with an 18K Yield = $0.0166
Drum - $27 with a 30K yield = $0.0009
Total CPP - $0.0175

If the drum info is incorrect then the total CPP info would have to be wrong as well.


WoW! I'm thinking this is a mistake, and the drum should have been $127, maybe someone can check the dealer supply price schedule on this!
quote:
Originally posted by txeagle24:
I haven't looked at it yet, but through the Lexmark BSD program, the street CPP is $.020-$.023. This is a great little unit that is capable of running 10k/month. The only drawback is the somewhat high CPP, but it's in line with the comparable Ricoh OEM model that is slow and lacks a touch screen.


What is the cost for the Lexmark drum?
What margin??? I think the spread between dealer cost and MSRP is about $400.

For me to be comfortable giving the customer the level of support I give them on an MFP after the sale I would need to walk away with at least $350 in my commission check on the deal. That means I would need to charge at least $2,100 for the sale and installation of this product. That's why I don't pay much attention to small machines. Just can't make enough on them. I wind up giving more support after the sale on these small machines are worth. I quote high and it is what it is on tabletops.
quote:
Originally posted by fisher:
What margin??? I think the spread between dealer cost and MSRP is about $400.

For me to be comfortable giving the customer the level of support I give them on an MFP after the sale I would need to walk away with at least $350 in my commission check on the deal. That means I would need to charge at least $2,100 for the sale and installation of this product. That's why I don't pay much attention to small machines. Just can't make enough on them. I wind up giving more support after the sale on these small machines are worth. I quote high and it is what it is on tabletops.


These require significantly less service/support than the Ricoh table-top machines. The opportunity to make money on these is by selling them to replace printers as part of an MPS engagement & making your money on the aftermarket. Also, if you're replacing an MP2000 machine, and the customer doesn't need 11 x 17, they would be thrilled with this machine, and you could make solid margin because of the price spread between the MP2000 and this unit. I'll be curious to see how the Ricoh Aficio League points pay out on these. Lexmark pays $50 per unit.
Obviously competition in areas varies and often dictates what we can or can't charge. However, I think the day is rapidly approaching where there won't be enough opportunities at decent commission to make a living there. My level of support is often times predicated on the size (and therefore profit) of the deal. I say deal because if a deal has the potential of a dozen SP 4410's, it may be worth top level support. When I started 30+ years ago, 100% of the copiers sold were sold by people like me and paid a decent commission to somebody. I don't know what the percentage would be now but it is less, significantly less...maybe 50%. Whatever that number is, it continues to dwindell and may reach a point someday where only production level units require our expertise.
quote:
Originally posted by Old Glory:

Whatever that number is, it continues to dwindell and may reach a point someday where only production level units require our expertise.


I feel that we are already there as far as table top units go. Sement 2 or above is the only way left to make money. Just finished doing commissions and am feeling a little depressed. Its to the point where I can't even make a decent commission on a 25ppm A3 Color machine.
I don't see how this can be an effective product in an MPS strategy beacuse of the high cpp. It has more speed and a much more modern and user-friendly appearing interface than the Savin 920spf but run a comparison of the CPP between the Savin 920spf cost per page and the 4410SPF cost per page and tell me which you would rather support - many times we are charging between .01 and .015 for service and supplies - how can we do that on this product and make a profit? - I just don't see it.
quote:
Originally posted by Art Post:
yup, I'm not sure where to position this except for replacing back orders on 201's. very high cpp. Why don't the manufacturers just stop with the AIO and release and A4 printer with the cost per page model of A3.


The manufacturers are trying to transition to a services-based business model in which they make their profit from service rather than hardware. If they were to release an A4 printer/MFP with the low hardware cost of most A4 devices and the CPP of an A3 device, they shoot themselves in the foot. At some point, A4 devices will have close to the same CPP of A3 devices, but it won't be at the beginning of the lifecycle of this product category/niche. Additionally, revenue from A3 devices would plummet if they were to take this pricing approach, because many buyers would opt for the extremely low TCO versus paying a premium for features that are traditionally only found in A3 devices.

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×