Skip to main content

By Bill Donahue

Law360, New York (April 05, 2013, 1:11 PM ET)

-- Konica Minolta Business Solutions USA Inc. will pay $4.3 million to resolve allegations that it violated state and federal labor laws by underpaying overtime to hundreds of technical support employees, according to a settlement filed Thursday in Texas federal court.

The deal will wrap up more than two years of litigation over whether Konica Minolta breached the Fair Labor Standards Act and state laws in Illinois, Massachussetts and New York by requiring training, extensive travel and other extra activities without additional compensation.

The settlement, first reached in February, will certify a Rule 23 class of approximately 800 workers on the state law claims and certify a collective of roughly 250 employees on the FLSA claims.

In taking the immediate payout, the plaintiffs said they believed in their case but wanted to avoid the risks of ongoing litigation.

“This case is now over two years old and, with continued litigation, motion practice, and appeals, could easily last additional years,” the employees said in the settlement papers. “When balanced against the tremendous time and cost associated with continued litigation, the immediate recovery provided for with this settlement favors a determination that the settlement is fair, reasonable and adequate.”

A spokeswoman for Konica Minolta didn't immediately return a request for comment Friday.

Under the settlement, Konica Minolta will pay $85,000 in incentive payments to 11 named plaintiffs, with individuals getting between $5,000 and $20,000. Galvin B. Kennedy of Kennedy Hodges LLP, lead counsel for the class, and other plaintiffs attorneys will get up to $157,438 — or 32 percent of the total deal — for their work on the case.

One technician, John Glass, who took an early lead in the case and was terminated shortly after the launch of the suit, will get an additional $106,000 to drop retaliation claims against the company.

“Glass was the only [named plaintiff] who was a current employee at the time he became part of the lawsuit as a class representative [and] was the only class representative who ran the risk of retaliation,” the settlement said. “He became a class representative on May 18, 2010. Six days later, on May 24, 2010, KMBS terminated his employment after having worked with the company for approximately 10 years.”

The filing said Konica Minolta “vigorously disputes” the allegation and that it still maintains that Glass was fired for “reasons wholly unrelated” to the case.

The service technicians first sued in March 2010, claiming they'd been forced to attend training classes, had been made to conduct inventory and spent time traveling to and from client locations, but didn't get extra pay because they were improperly classified as exempt from the FLSA's overtime requirements.

Several other state law cases were filed around the same time, and all have been folded into the current case. The settlement filed Thursday must still be approved by the court.

Konica was represented by Haynes Boone LLP and Seyfarth Shaw LLP.

The class was represented by Galvin B. Kennedy of Kennedy Hodges LLP.

The case is Watson et al v. Konica Minolta Business Solutions U.S.A., Inc., case number 4:10-cv-00986, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas.
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Art,

I remember when I was a technician, and the VP of service told all techs that we had to be at our first call at 8AM. I said fine, what do you want me to do about picking up parts? He said that I had to pick them up before 8AM. I asked are you going to pay me the overtime, and he said no.

I told him that the labor board said he had to. He turned a shade of gray and asked "Did you speak to the labor board?" I said did. but for advice, I haven't filed a complaint (YET was unspoken, but heavily implied). I told him that the labor board said that he can tell me to be anywhere at 8AM, but if he tells me to be anywhere before 8AM he has to pay overtime.

He decided that it would be OK for me pick up my parts at 8AM. While I have never been in a union, I understand what Unions did, and how they helped workers when they came on the scene. If employers treat their workers fair there is no need for a union. If they treat their workers like you described above, don't be surprised if they unionize.

Just an FYI, I am not against the concept of Unions, But I believe that I can negotiate better for myself than anyone else can negotiate on my behalf.
Vince

Just and FYI I cut and reposted that article for all us.

You know it's a fine line in sales also, even though I'm listed as salaried, if I had no sick days or vacation days left and I wanted or had to leave early I would get docked for those hours. So, in a sense they figure out the daily then the hourly, then dock the pay.

So, what happens when you have to be at a mandatory meeting that runs past 5PM? Personally I think I'm entitled to extra pay since you're stating I have to be there. It's really up to me how many hours I want to work over the 40 hours each week, of course I don't have to either.

Just wanted to throw that out there.

Art

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×