GHODS v. CITICORP VENDOR FINANCE, INC.
MOHAMMED K. GHODS, Plaintiff and Appellant,v.CITICORP VENDOR FINANCE, INC., Defendant and Respondent.
No. G042251.
Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Three.
Filed December 29, 2010.
Mohammed K. Ghods and William A. Stahr for Plaintiff and Appellant.
TroyGould, Russ M. Fukano, Kenneth J. MacArthur, and Christopher A. Lilly for Defendant and Respondent.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
OPINION
O'LEARY, ACTING P. J.
This is the second appeal filed by Mohammed K. Ghods, an attorney, regarding his grievance over a broken leased photocopier. He filed a lawsuit seeking $250,000 in damages, plus punitive damages, and attorney fees and costs. He sued the leasing company, Citicorp Vender Finance, Inc. (Citicorp) and the copier dealer, Select Office Solutions, Inc. (Select). The trial court entered a judgment of dismissal in favor of Citicorp after sustaining its demurrer to Ghods's third amended complaint (TAC) without leave to amend.
In his first appeal, Ghods challenged the judgment, arguing he alleged facts sufficient to support his claims, or the court should have given him leave to amend to correct any perceived deficiencies or uncertainties. We affirmed the judgment, concluding the trial court gave Ghods ample opportunity to remedy the defects and uncertainty in his complaint, and the demurrer was properly sustained without leave to amend. (Mohammed K. Ghods v. Citicorp Vendor Finance Inc. (Mar. 30, 2010, G041438) [nonpub. opn.].)
http://www.leagle.com/xmlResul...SLWAR3-2007-CURRHERE'S THE REST.........
Original Post