I’m reviewing some trends that I am seeing regarding the office color MFP and production color segments. Specifically changes to the product mix, price positioning, as well as tactics/practices that are being used to help push color systems.
I was wondering if anyone had any thoughts about the following trends:
1) Office Color HW Costs Falling
Many manufacturers expanded low-priced color MFP options or lowered pricing/increased value of latest generations.
* Canon, Konica, Oce, and Panasonic all launched new A4 color desktops under copier brands. Canon, Konica, Oce, and Panasonics were only rebranded A4 printers and would not appeal to many office environments. But still provide an entry-level color option within their copier brands.
* Ricoh expanded low-end A3 color range with addition of MP C2030 ($5.5k)/ MP C2050 ($5.8k)/ and MP C2550 ($7.5). It reduced pricing / improved value with MP C2800 ($10.7k) /C3300 ($12.5k) / C4000 ($14k) / and C5000 ($17k), while offering standard generational improvements.
What is the general consensus on how the C2030/C2050 has helped lure B2C or convenience color users that may have been deterred by Color HW sticker shock with the previous C2000/C2500 systems?
* Sharp went another direction with its A4 MFPs and positioned its Frontier line as a competitor against both A3 Copiers and A4 Printers – offers major HW discounts from A3 copiers. Not sure if you noticed, but the Frontier C311/C401's shipments were far higher in Q1 than in Q2. Not sure if this is due to initial "deliveries" to dealers in Q1, while Q2 was actually from sales and orders from dealers to restock inventories.
Does anyone see these systems beating out A3 color MFPs or gaining overall market share from Seg. 3 A3 color MFPs?
2) MFRs look to light production as targeted growth area:
Following Konica Minolta's success with the bizhub Pro C6500/5500 and launch of 2nd generation Pro C6501/C5501, Ricoh and Canon (soon) have entered the color light production segment.
* Canon's imageRUNNER Advanced Pro C9060 and C9070, should help fill the light production gap between iR C5185 and imagePRESS C6000/C7000. The forthcoming imageRUNNER Advance C7065 (60ppm/65ppm) and C7055 (50ppm/55ppm) should help further fill-in this speed gap (but these are office systems). The word is that these Pro models will have very long-lasting parts and low maintenance costs, making the prospect of selling them less scary from a margin perspective than other light production/production systems.
* The last year brought Ricoh’s entrance into the color light production and mid-production space with the C900/C900s and the Pro C550EX/C700EX. Although the C900 looks like a solid first step into color production, there may be some growing pains (outside of IKON) due to dealers' lack of production experience/contacts and printers' existing brand loyalty/hesitations about buying a 1st generation system.
Does anyone see these replacing or beating Xerox/Konica/Canon systems?
The Aficio Pro C550EX and Pro C700EX seem more like short term solutions, since they are basically the C6000/c7500 with an added standard LCT and Fiery server. However, they still add two more color light production systems to Ricoh's lineup.
Does anyone see these replacing or beating Xerox/Konica/Canon systems?
3) MFRs Expand HV Office Color Lines:
Manufactures also identified HV office color as a growth segment and expanded their lines in that segment.
* Canon iR Advanced C7065 (60ppm/65ppm) C7055 (50ppm/55ppm), and C5051 (51ppm/51ppm) will collectively replace the iR C5185 (51ppm). Giving Canon two brand new HV office color options.
* Kyocera Mita's TASKalfa 750c and TASKalfa 500ci series launches gave the company five MFPs with color output speeds above 40-ppm, compared to zero models at this time last year.
* Toshiba's e-STUDIO5520C/6520C/6530C and e-STUDIO5530C PRO/STUDIO7030C PRO gave the vendor 5 MFPs with color speed above 55-ppm (vs. 1 last year) and the 7030c PRO (75ppm/70ppm) opened up a new user base to Toshiba. Pro models will often be positioned as light production models.
4) Improved Consumable yields and costs
* Konica Minolta continues to shift its color MFPs away from using imaging units featuring both drum-developer to offering separate mono developer and drums. This provides greater cost benefits for mono output and allows lower Mono CPC. Konica Minolta also increased toner and other consumable yields in its latest generation and forthcoming Color MFPs.
* Xerox' ColorQube turned the sales model on its head with three-tier coverage based usage costs. So far street pricing seems to reflect Xerox' stated savings, but the challenge will be justifying HW costs.
Xerox barely changed consumable yields from WC 7300 to WC 7400, but the new LED-based models' mono and CLR toner have 18 and 11 percent lower MSRPs, respectively.
* Toshiba and Kyocera improved consumable yields with their new color MFP generations. Brand new systems' yields are even higher.
* Sharp's new A3 CLR MFP generations had unchanged toner & drum yields- but significantly expanded CLR and BW Developer yields
* Conversely Ricoh only changed yields on the C2050/C2030/C2550, shifting to far lower capacity toner than C2000/C2500. But the cons are lower cost too and the HW price is far lower too so overall value is relatively unchanged.
5) Trend to 11x17 single click metering for color
Xerox started this with its production systems, but 11x17 single click is becoming increasingly offered with all office & light production color systems.
This is especially true for MFRs’ direct operations. Dealers that do not offer A3 CLR single-click are having a hard time beating this from an end-user value standpoint, but most can’t justify it from a margin/cost standpoint.
6) Increased promotions
I’ve seen a number or leasing and click promotions, but I have less visibility for many of these. Has anyone noticed trends in competitive promotions to help push color systems and gain share?
How about other emerging strategies or tactics etc?
7) If you are seeing any other trends that are emerging or being increasingly used to gain a competitive advantage within the <$100k color range I would be interested in hearing those too. Thanks for the insight!
Original Post